Functional Agroecosystems: An Ultimate Solution for Mitigating Floods and Droughts in India

Functional Agroecosystems: An Ultimate Solution for Mitigating Floods and Droughts in India

By CM Biradar, GGGC 

In an era of rapid economic growth and increasing climate uncertainty, India and the world face significant challenges in balancing development with environmental sustainability. Functional agroecosystems are emerging as a powerful solution to address the dual challenges of floods and droughts while supporting the country’s agricultural sector. By embracing sustainable farming practices such as regenerative agriculture and agroforestry, India can create resilient landscapes that not only withstand extreme weather events but also contribute to a greener, more equitable future (Biradar et al., 2021).

India has experienced remarkable economic growth in recent years, with its GDP expanding at an average rate of 6.6% between 2014 and 2019 to 7.3-8.2 % in 2024. However, this growth has come at an environmental cost. India’s CO₂ emissions have risen by 335% since 1990, reaching 2.6 billion tonnes in 2019. Per capita CO₂ emissions in India have soared in recent decades, climbing from roughly 0.4 MT in 1970 to 2.07 MT in 2023. Unsustainable land management, especially agricultural practices and intensification, has led to soil degradation, affecting 147 million hectares or 44.7% of India’s total land area. The reduction of perennial vegetation and trees in landscapes, along with climate change, has exacerbated India’s vulnerability to natural as well as manmade disasters. 

Image 1: Map showing tree deficit landscapes of India, predominantly intensive agricultural and degraded lands.  

The frequency of extreme events such as cyclones, floods, and droughts and heat waves has increased by 52% between 2001-2019 compared to 1982-2000. Floods affected more than 17 million people annually between 2010-2021. Droughts have become more frequent, with 42% of India’s land area facing drought in 2019. There is certainly need of drought and flood warning to mitigate these impacts (van Ginkel, and Biradar, 2021). These statistics underscore the urgent need for sustainable solutions to enhance India’s resilience to climate change while supporting its agricultural sector, which employs nearly 42% of the country’s workforce.

The Power of Functional Production Systems

Functional production systems, which refer to functional agroecosystems, regenerative agriculture, agroforestry, natural farming, permaculture, etc mainly embody the fundamental ecological principle that ‘production follows functions.’ This paradigm shift represents a powerful approach to creating economically viable and ecologically sustainable landscapes. By prioritizing ecosystem functions—such as nutrient cycling, water retention, and biodiversity support—these systems naturally enhance agricultural productivity. The integration of diversified crops, multipurpose trees, and indigenous livestock creates a complex web of interactions that mimics natural ecosystems. For instance, nitrogen-fixing trees enrich soil fertility, reducing the need for synthetic fertilizers, while also providing fodder for livestock and improving soil structure. This enhanced soil structure, in turn, increases water retention capacity, making the landscape more resilient to both floods and droughts. The diverse plant species support a rich array of pollinators and beneficial insects, naturally managing pests and reducing the need for chemical interventions. As these ecological functions are restored and strengthened, agricultural production becomes more stable and sustainable. This approach not only leads to more consistent yields but also opens up multiple income streams for farmers through diversified products such as fruits, timber, honey, and livestock products. The result is a green economic growth model where ecological sustainability and economic viability are mutually reinforcing, creating resilient landscapes that can withstand climate variability while supporting rural livelihoods and contributing to national food security. 

Functional agroecosystems are built on the principle of systematic integration. This approach combines: 1. Diversified crops, 2. Multipurpose trees, and 3. Indigenous livestock.  This integration creates a symbiotic environment where each element supports and enhances the others, addressing multiple crises simultaneously.

The Five Highs of Functional Agroecosystems

Functional agroecosystems operate on a principle of interconnected “five highs” that synergistically contribute to ‘good food’ and ‘livable environmental’ security while fostering sustainable and resilient livelihoods (Biradar 2021). This process begins with high biodiversity, which forms the foundation of ecosystem resilience. Increased biodiversity, including both above- and below-ground species, enhances ecosystem functionality through niche complementarity and facilitation effects (Isbell et al., 2017). This biodiversity directly contributes to the second “high”: enhanced carbon sequestration. Diverse plant communities, particularly those including deep-rooted perennials and trees, significantly increase soil organic carbon stocks (Lange et al., 2015). The improved soil structure resulting from higher organic matter content leads to the third “high”: increased water retention capacity. Research indicates that a 1% increase in soil organic matter can increase water-holding capacity by up to 3.7% (Hudson, 1994) and 1 gram of soil organic matter holds 8 grams of water and a kg of leguminous mixed tree leaf litter holds water anywhere from 50-100 litres, also help observe atmospheric water (Biradar et al. 2022x and field observations). These three factors collectively support the fourth “high”: high productivity. The improved soil health, soil water availability, and ecosystem services (such as pollination and natural pest control) provided by biodiversity result in more stable and often higher yields (Pretty et al., 2018, Biradar et al, 2021). Finally, this productivity, combined with the diverse income streams from a multi-functional landscape, contributes to the fifth “high”: high equity and social inclusion. The distributed benefits of a diverse agroecosystem, including non-timber forest products, livestock outputs, and ecosystem services, can lead to more equitable economic outcomes for rural communities (Waldron et al., 2017). This sequential process of five highs creates a positive feedback loop, where each “high” reinforces and amplifies the others, resulting in a robust system that enhances both ecological and socio-economic resilience.

Restoring Biodiversity

One of the key benefits of functional agroecosystems is the restoration of biodiversity. By moving away from monoculture farming and embracing a diverse range of plant and animal species. Restoring agro-biodiversity through the strategic incorporation of diverse crops, trees, and livestock is fundamental to creating resilient and productive agroecosystems. This approach, tailored with site-specific interventions, significantly enriches habitats for beneficial microbiomes, insects, pollinators, and birds, thereby enhancing natural pest and disease control mechanisms (Altieri et al., 2015; Biradar et al., 2020). Research indicates that increasing plant diversity can reduce pest abundance by 36% and increase pest enemy abundance by 44% compared to monocultures (Dainese et al., 2019). This enhanced biodiversity contributes to improved land and water productivity, with studies showing that diversified farming systems can increase yield stability by up to 15% (Raseduzzaman and Jensen, 2017). A prime example of this approach is the traditional Indian Nandi Krishi system, which reintroduces cow and oxen-based farming. This system approach promotes akkadi salu (mixed cropping), inter-cropping, and relay cropping, integrated with bio-fertilizer (bio-N, green manure and mulch) and fodder trees. Such integration creates a more balanced ecosystem that not only increases diet diversity but also ensures a continuous supply of fodder for livestock, especially in the off-season. Moreover, this diverse system significantly enhances carbon sequestration potential, with agroforestry and regenerative agroecosystems capable of sequestering much higher carbon sequestration than monocropping. The incorporation of livestock in this system further contributes to soil health through manure inputs and biological nitrogen fixation, potentially increasing soil organic carbon by 0.5-1.5 Mg ha^-1 year^-1 (Lal, 2004). This holistic approach to agro-biodiversity restoration thus creates a synergistic effect, simultaneously addressing issues of productivity, sustainability, and climate resilience in agricultural landscapes.

Carbon Sequestration and Healthy Soil

Healthy soil is the best indicator of healthy people and a healthy nation. Regenerative agriculture practices, a cornerstone of functional agroecosystems, focus on restoring and building soil health. This approach increases organic matter in the soil, enhances carbon sequestration and improves soil structure and water retention capacity. As a result, these systems become powerful carbon sinks, contributing to climate change mitigation while also becoming more resilient to extreme weather events. 

Building upon the high biodiversity in functional agroecosystems, the resultant increase in carbon sequestration potential plays a crucial role in enhancing soil health and overall ecosystem resilience. Diversified systems of crops, trees, and livestock effectively maximize solar energy capture and atmospheric carbon fixation, leading to substantial increases in soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks. Research indicates that agroforestry systems in India can sequester 0.5-6.9 Mg C ha^-1 year^-1 (Dhyani et al., 2017), while the integration of livestock can further enhance SOC by 0.5-1.5 Mg ha^-1 year^-1 (Lal, 2004). This enhanced carbon sequestration significantly improves soil structure and function. Higher SOC levels are strongly correlated with increased soil microbial biomass and diversity, with studies showing up to a 30% increase in microbial biomass carbon for each 1% increase in SOC (Fierer et al., 2009). The improved soil structure and microbial activity dramatically enhance water retention capacity, with each 1% increase in soil organic matter potentially increasing water holding capacity by up to 3.7% (Hudson, 1994). This improved water retention, coupled with enhanced infiltration rates due to better soil structure, significantly aids in rainwater harvesting and groundwater recharge. Consequently, these processes contribute to the restoration of springsheds and the rejuvenation of river flows. For instance, a study in the Western Ghats of India found that agroforestry-based watershed management increased stream flow by 23-65% compared to monoculture landscapes (Bonell et al., 2010). Thus, the cascade of effects from high biodiversity to enhanced carbon sequestration creates a positive feedback loop, fostering soil health, improving water cycles, and ultimately enhancing the overall resilience and productivity of the agroecosystem.

On-Farm Soil Water Management

The most critical aspect of functional agroecosystems in the context of flood and drought mitigation is their superior land and on-farm soil water management capabilities. These systems excel at harvesting rainwater (holding rain where it falls), storing water in the soil profile and managing the subsurface flow and return of springsheds. By improving soil structure and increasing organic matter content, these systems can absorb and retain more water during heavy rainfall events, reducing the risk of flooding. During dry periods, the stored water helps sustain crops and maintain ecosystem functions, mitigating the impacts of drought.

On-farm water management leads to high rainwater retention in the soil is a critical outcome of the synergistic relationship between biodiversity and soil health in functional agroecosystems. The enhanced biodiversity, particularly the diversity of plant species and their associated root systems and rhizosphere interactions (root exudates), coupled with increased soil organic matter (SOM), significantly improves the water dynamics of the farm ecosystem. One gram of soil organic matter (SOC) holds eight grams of water, and with each 1% increase in SOM, the water-holding capacity of soil increases by approximately 3.5-8% (Hudson, 1994). This improved water retention is further enhanced by the diverse below-ground biomass, with studies showing that a 10% increase in root biomass can lead to a 5-10% increase in soil water storage capacity (Yadav et al., 2019). 

Image 2: Role of the trees and perineal vegetation cover in enhancing groundwater recharge and reducing surface runoff leads to return of springsheds 

The complex root networks of diverse plant communities also substantially increase soil porosity and infiltration rates. For instance, agroforestry systems have been found to increase infiltration rates by 1.6-10.2 times compared to monoculture systems (Ilstedt et al., 2007). These improvements in soil structure and water infiltration significantly reduce surface runoff, with some studies reporting reductions of up to 65% in diverse agroecosystems compared to conventional systems (Palm et al., 2014). Consequently, this leads to increased subsurface base flow and enhanced groundwater recharge. The reduced surface runoff also mitigates soil erosion, with agroforestry systems showing up to 50% lower erosion rates compared to conventional agriculture (Nair, 2007). These combined effects of improved water retention and reduced soil loss contribute to enhanced land and water productivity. Studies have shown that water use efficiency in diverse agroecosystems can be up to 100% higher than in monocultures (Mao et al., 2012). Furthermore, the improved water availability and soil health help plants overcome both biotic and abiotic stresses. For example, diverse agroforestry systems have demonstrated 20-30% higher resilience to drought compared to monoculture systems (Verchot et al., 2007). Thus, high on-farm water retention serves as a crucial link in the chain of ecosystem services provided by functional agroecosystems, contributing significantly to their overall resilience and productivity.

Green Economic Transition

Functional agroecosystems don’t just benefit the environment; they also offer significant economic advantages, such as higher and more stable yields, reduced input costs (e.g., fertilizers, pesticides), diversified income streams and increased resilience to market fluctuations and more climate-smart. This economic model supports a green economic transition, moving agriculture towards sustainability while maintaining or even improving profitability.

Image 3: Production follows function and restoring the ecological functions is critical for green economic transition with multiple benefits and co-existence  

Functional agroecosystems not only confer environmental benefits but also offer substantial economic advantages, driving a green economic transition in agriculture. These systems demonstrate higher and more stable yields, with meta-analyses showing yield increases of 20-55% and yield stability improvements of up to 30% compared to conventional monocultures (Pretty et al., 2018; Raseduzzaman & Jensen, 2017). The diversification inherent in these systems significantly reduces input costs; studies report decreases in synthetic fertilizer use by 30-50% and pesticide use by 50-100% (Davis et al., 2012). Furthermore, the integration of multiple crops, trees, and livestock creates diversified income streams, enhancing economic resilience. Research indicates that agroforestry systems can increase farm profitability by 40-70% compared to monoculture systems (Roshetko et al., 2013). This economic diversification also bolsters resilience to market fluctuations; a study of 1,800 farms across 10 European countries found that more diverse farms had 30% lower income variability (Bowles et al., 2020). Importantly, functional agroecosystems are inherently climate-smart, with improved adaptive capacity and mitigation potential. They demonstrate 20-30% higher resilience to climatic stresses compared to conventional systems (Verchot et al., 2007), while simultaneously sequestering 0.5-6.9 Mg C ha^-1 year^-1 in the Indian context (Dhyani et al., 2017). The economic value of these ecosystem services, including improved soil health and water regulation, has been estimated at $600-1,000 ha^-1 year^-1 (Sandhu et al., 2016). This confluence of economic and environmental benefits supports a green economic transition, shifting agriculture towards sustainability while maintaining or even enhancing profitability. As such, functional agroecosystems represent a viable pathway for achieving multiple Sustainable Development Goals, including Zero Hunger, Climate Action, and Life on Land (Waldron et al., 2017), making them a cornerstone of sustainable agricultural development.

Image 4: Green economic growth and netzero transition through nature-centric solutions to redefine the traditional sustainability paradigm by creating harmonious interactions between human progress and natural systems.

Building Equity and Social Inclusion

The adoption of functional agroecosystems can also address social inequalities in agriculture. These systems empower small-scale farmers with sustainable, low-input techniques, preserve and value traditional and Indigenous farming knowledge, create diverse employment opportunities in rural areas and Improve food security and nutrition at the local level. By integrating social considerations into agricultural practices, functional agroecosystems contribute to building more equitable and inclusive rural communities.

Functional agroecosystems play a pivotal role in addressing social inequalities and fostering inclusive rural communities. These systems are particularly empowering for small-scale farmers, who constitute 84% of all farms globally (Lowder et al., 2016). By promoting sustainable, low-input techniques, functional agroecosystems can reduce production costs by 30-60% compared to conventional systems (Pretty et al., 2018), making agriculture more accessible and profitable for resource-poor farmers. Furthermore, these systems inherently value and integrate traditional and Indigenous farming knowledge, enhancing cultural preservation and social inclusion. A study in India found that agroforestry systems incorporating traditional practices improved farmers’ income by 25-30% while simultaneously strengthening cultural identity (Pandey, 2007). The diversification inherent in functional agroecosystems creates varied employment opportunities in rural areas, with research indicating a 30-50% increase in labor demand compared to monocultures (Altieri et al., 2015). This diversification also significantly improves local food security and nutrition. A meta-analysis of 50 studies across the Global South found that farm diversification increased dietary diversity scores by 14-18% (Jones, 2017). Moreover, functional agroecosystems contribute to gender equity; a study across 60 sites in Africa reported that agroforestry initiatives increased women’s income by 17-25% and their participation in household decision-making by 20-35% (Kiptot & Franzel, 2012). By integrating these social considerations into agricultural practices, functional agroecosystems foster more equitable and inclusive rural communities. They address multiple dimensions of rural poverty and social marginalization, aligning closely with Sustainable Development Goals such as No Poverty, Zero Hunger, and Gender Equality (FAO, 2018). Thus, functional agroecosystems serve not only as a tool for ecological sustainability but also as a powerful mechanism for social transformation in rural landscapes.

Conclusion

Nature offers infinite potential and options for unlocking natural solutions for sustainable living and livelihoods through restoring functional agroecosystems (Biradar 2021). We have learned from evidence at scale about food, water, land, carbon footprint, and how the agroecosystem approach transforms unsustainable land use through untapped potential. Regenerative agroecosystems offer a transformative approach to agriculture that simultaneously addresses climate change, nutrition security, and economic sustainability. This synthesis workshop explores the potential of these systems to drive a green economic transition while achieving net-zero emissions and improving global nutrition.

Functional agroecosystems represent a holistic solution to the pressing challenges of floods, droughts, and climate change. By embracing the principles of regenerative agriculture and agroforestry, we can create resilient landscapes that not only withstand extreme weather events but also restore biodiversity, sequester carbon, and build healthier soils.

These systems offer a path towards a green economic transition in agriculture, one that values sustainability, resilience, and social equity. As we face an uncertain climate future, the adoption and scaling of functional agroecosystems may well be one of our most powerful tools for creating a sustainable and food-secure world.

References

Altieri, M. A., Nicholls, C. I., Henao, A., & Lana, M. A. (2015). Agroecology and the design of climate change-resilient farming systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35(3), 869-890.

Biradar, C., Rizvi, J., & Dandin, S. (2022). Diversified farming systems for changing climate and consumerism. Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 17(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.24154/jhs.v17i1.2174

Biradar, C. 2021. Digital augmentation to support the agro-ecological transformation of agri-food systems in the drylands of Africa and Asia. In Agroecological transformation for sustainable food systems. Special France-CGIAR partnership. UN Food Systems Summit. Agropolis Internation. New York, September 2021. 

Biradar C., 2021. Innovation in digital augmentation for empowering agricultural extension. Agriculture Today. Volume XXIV (04), 48-49

Biradar, C., S. Ghosh, A. Sarker, R. Singh, F, Löw, R.N. Sahoo, K. El-Shamma, L. Atassi, P. Chandna, N. Swain, G, Choudhury, S. Agrawal, A. H. Rizvi, J. Dong, A. Gaur, and J. Wery. 2019. Geo-Big -Data and digital augmentation for accelerating agroecological intensification in drylands. Archives of Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 42-3(6). 545-448  

Biradar, C.M. and Xiao, X. 2010. Quantifying the area and spatial distribution of double- and triple-cropping croplands in India with multi-temporal MODIS imagery in 2005. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 32(2), 367-386. 

Biradar, C.M., Thenkabail, P.S., Noojipady, P., Yuanjie, L., Dheeravath, V., Velpuri, M., Turral, H., Gumma, M.K., Reddy, O.G.P., Xueliang, L. C., Xiao, X., Schull, M.A., Alankara, R.D., Gunasinghe, S., Mohideen, S., 2009. A global map of rainfed cropland areas (GMRCA) at the end of last millennium using remote sensing. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 11 (2009) 114–129.

Bowles, T. M., Mooshammer, M., Socolar, Y., Calderón, F., Cavigelli, M. A., Culman, S. W., … & Grandy, A. S. (2020). Long-term evidence shows that crop-rotation diversification increases agricultural resilience to adverse growing conditions in North America. One Earth, 2(3), 284-293.

Dainese, M., Martin, E. A., Aizen, M. A., Albrecht, M., Bartomeus, I., Bommarco, R., … & Steffan-Dewenter, I. (2019). A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production. Science Advances, 5(10), eaax0121.

Davis, A. S., Hill, J. D., Chase, C. A., Johanns, A. M., & Liebman, M. (2012). Increasing cropping system diversity balances productivity, profitability and environmental health. PloS one, 7(10), e47149.

Dhyani, S. K., Handa, A. K., & Uma. (2017). Area under agroforestry in India: An assessment for present status and future perspective. Indian Journal of Agroforestry, 19(1), 89-96.

FAO. (2018). Transforming Food and Agriculture to Achieve the SDGs: 20 interconnected actions to guide decision-makers. Rome.

Jones, A. D. (2017). Critical review of the emerging research evidence on agricultural biodiversity, diet diversity, and nutritional status in low- and middle-income countries. Nutrition Reviews, 75(10), 769-782.

Fierer, N., Strickland, M. S., Liptzin, D., Bradford, M. A., & Cleveland, C. C. (2009). Global patterns in belowground communities. Ecology Letters, 12(11), 1238-1249.

Hudson, B. D. (1994). Soil organic matter and available water capacity. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 49(2), 189-194.

Ilstedt, U., Malmer, A., Verbeeten, E., & Murdiyarso, D. (2007). The effect of afforestation on water infiltration in the tropics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Forest Ecology and Management, 251(1-2), 45-51.

Isbell, F., Adler, P. R., Eisenhauer, N., Fornara, D., Kimmel, K., Kremen, C., … & Scherer-Lorenzen, M. (2017). Benefits of increasing plant diversity in sustainable agroecosystems. Journal of Ecology, 105(4), 871-879.

Kiptot, E., & Franzel, S. (2012). Gender and agroforestry in Africa: a review of women’s participation. Agroforestry Systems, 84(1), 35-58.

Lal, R. (2004). Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science, 304(5677), 1623-1627.

Lange, M., Eisenhauer, N., Sierra, C. A., Bessler, H., Engels, C., Griffiths, R. I., … & Gleixner, G. (2015). Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage. Nature Communications, 6(1), 1-8.

Lowder, S. K., Skoet, J., & Raney, T. (2016). The number, size, and distribution of farms, smallholder farms, and family farms worldwide. World Development, 87, 16-29.

Mao, L. L., Zhang, L. Z., Li, W. Q., van der Werf, W., Sun, J. H., Spiertz, H., & Li, L. (2012). Yield advantage and water saving in maize/pea intercrop. Field Crops Research, 138, 11-20.

Nair, P. K. R. (2007). The coming of age of agroforestry. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 87(9), 1613-1619.

Palm, C., Blanco-Canqui, H., DeClerck, F., Gatere, L., & Grace, P. (2014). Conservation agriculture and ecosystem services: An overview. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 187, 87-105.

Pandey, D. N. (2007). Multifunctional agroforestry systems in India. Current Science, 92(4), 455-463.

Pretty, J., Benton, T. G., Bharucha, Z. P., Dicks, L. V., Flora, C. B., Godfray, H. C. J., … & Pierzynski, G. (2018). Global assessment of agricultural system redesign for sustainable intensification. Nature Sustainability, 1(8), 441-446.

Purandara, B. K., Venkatesh, B., Krishnaswamy, J., Acharya, H. A. K., Singh, U. V., … & Chappell, N. (2010). The impact of forest use and reforestation on soil hydraulic conductivity in the Western Ghats of India: Implications for surface and sub-surface hydrology. Journal of Hydrology, 391(1-2), 47-62.

Raseduzzaman, M., & Jensen, E. S. (2017). Does intercropping enhance yield stability in arable crop production? A meta-analysis. European Journal of Agronomy, 91, 25-33.

Roshetko, J. M., Lasco, R. D., & Angeles, M. S. D. (2013). Smallholder agroforestry systems for carbon storage. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 12(2), 219-242.

Sandhu, H., Wratten, S. D., Costanza, R., Pretty, J., Porter, J. R., & Reganold, J. (2016). Significance and value of non-traded ecosystem services on farmland. PeerJ, 3, e762.

van Ginkel, M. and Biradar, C. 2021. Drought Early Warning in Agri-Food Systems. Climate Journal Special Issue on “Drought Early Warning”. Climate 2021, 9, 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli9090134  

Verchot, L. V., Van Noordwijk, M., Kandji, S., Tomich, T., Ong, C., Albrecht, A., … & Palm, C. (2007). Climate change: linking adaptation and mitigation through agroforestry. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 12(5), 901-918.

Yadav, S. S., Redden, R. J., Hatfield, J. L., Ebert, A. W., & Hunter, D. (Eds.). (2019). Food Security and Climate Change. John Wiley & Sons.

Waldron, A., Garrity, D., Malhi, Y., Girardin, C., Miller, D. C., & Seddon, N. (2017). Agroforestry can enhance food security while meeting other Sustainable Development Goals. Tropical Conservation Science, 10, 1940082917720667.

KALPAVRIKSHA & KAMADHENU: Sacred Allies for Health, Heritage, and Functional Food Systems

KALPAVRIKSHA & KAMADHENU: Sacred Allies for Health, Heritage, and Functional Food Systems

Toward Functional Fats and Natural Farming for Nutrition and Natural Living

Dr. Chandrashekhar M. Biradar, c.biradar@gmail.com | January 15, 2024

As India and much of the Global South face the converging crises of nutritional insecurity, ecological degradation, and climate instability, there is growing recognition of the value of reviving traditional, nature-aligned food systems. Rooted in ecological and ancient Indian wisdom and the holistic worldview of Sanatan Dharma, including the harmony of Pancha Mahabhutas (the five great elements: Earth, Water, Fire, Air, and Space), these systems offer time-tested approaches for restoring the health of both land and life.

Within this sacred ecology, two time-honoured and functionally significant elements stand out: virgin coconut oil derived from the Kalpavriksha (coconut tree), and desi cow ghee derived from Kamadhenu (indigenous cow). These are not just dietary ingredients—they are living expressions of a sustainable, regenerative food culture that nourishes the body, rejuvenates the soil, and strengthens rural livelihoods.These sacred species have long served as biocultural keystones across India. From the humid, coconut-rich coastal belts to the drought-prone drylands to mountains, the coconut tree and the indigenous cow have provided food, medicine, shelter, fuel, fiber, and spiritual sanctity. Their value systems are perennial, regenerative, and embedded in the household economy, community well-being, and ritual life.

Modern nutritional and biomedical science increasingly affirms what ancient Indian traditions have long upheld. Virgin coconut oil is exceptionally rich in medium-chain triglycerides (MCTs), particularly lauric acid, which is also found in human breast milk. These MCTs are rapidly metabolized by the liver into energy, and have been shown to possess potent antimicrobial, antiviral, metabolic, and neuroprotective properties (St-Onge & Jones, 2002; Dayrit, 2015). The oil is also known for its digestive ease, immune support, and lipid-balancing effects, making it suitable for both therapeutic and culinary applications.

Similarly, desi cow ghee, especially when made using the traditional bilona (hand-churned) method from the milk of grass-fed cows, is a rich source of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) such as butyrate. Butyrate is known to support gut integrity, reduce inflammation, improve insulin sensitivity, and serve as a key energy source for colonocytes (Canani et al., 2011). Ghee also acts as an anupāna (carrier) in Ayurvedic medicine, enhancing the bioavailability of fat-soluble nutrients and herbal compounds (Lad, 1984; Mishra et al., 2021). Both coconut oil and ghee are naturally stable at high temperatures, free from harmful trans fats and oxidative degradation seen in industrially refined seed oils (Willett et al., 2019).

Beyond their health benefits, the production systems of Kalpavriksha and Kamadhenu are rooted in ecological sustainability. Coconut palms thrive in mixed cropping systems, coastal and dryland agroforestry, and food forests, often with minimal irrigation and no synthetic inputs. Desi cows, when integrated into natural farming, enrich the system through cow dung, urine, ghee, curd, and milk, forming the Panchagavya suite used in seed treatment, soil inoculation, and pest management. Together, they contribute to closed-loop regenerative cycles, enhance soil organic carbon, support pollinators and biodiversity, and provide resilient income streams for smallholder farmers.

This paper explores the multidimensional value of Kalpavriksha and Kamadhenu—their nutritional qualities, ecological roles, and economic significance—within the broader context of regenerative agriculture, functional food systems, and green livelihoods. By weaving together ancestral knowledge and contemporary science, these sacred species provide a living framework to restore health, regenerate landscapes, and reimagine food systems that are in balance with nature.

Scientific references supporting these insights include studies on the role of MCTs and lauric acid in health (St-Onge & Jones, 2002; Dayrit, 2015), gut health benefits of butyrate (Canani et al., 2011), and research on agroecological integration of perennial species and indigenous livestock (Mishra et al., 2021; FAO, 2021; ICAR, 2022). As we seek pathways toward climate resilience and nutrition equity, it becomes increasingly clear that the solutions may lie not in external innovations, but in reconnecting with the rooted wisdom of Kalpavriksha and Kamadhenu.

Kalpavriksha: The Tree of Life and Functional Fat

The Coconut Tree (Cocos nucifera), traditionally referred to as Kalpavriksha in Indian scriptures, holds a unique place in both ecological and cultural landscapes. Literally meaning the “wish-fulfilling tree,” it has been celebrated for millennia in Indian coastal and island societies for its ability to provide nearly every essential need for human survival-food, drink, fuel, fiber, medicine, shelter, oil, sugar, and shade. In agroecological terms, it is a multipurpose perennial, deeply embedded in home gardens, coastal agroforestry systems, sacred groves, and temple precincts.

Modern science now affirms the nutritional, medicinal, and ecological importance of the coconut tree, especially the Virgin Coconut Oil (VCO) extracted through cold-pressing of fresh coconut kernel. Recognized by nutritionists and medical researchers as a functional fat, VCO contains a unique profile of medium-chain fatty acids that differentiate it from most other plant-based oils, local resources, and year-round productivity, making it a sustainable and circular economic asset.

Nutritional Composition and Functional Properties

Virgin Coconut Oil consists of 92 percent saturated fats, of which over 60 percent are medium-chain triglycerides (MCTs). The most dominant MCT in coconut oil is lauric acid (C12:0), accounting for approximately 48 to 52 percentof its fatty acid content. Lauric acid is also the principal fatty acid found in human breast milk, known for its antimicrobial and immunomodulatory properties (Dayrit, 2015; Enig, 2000).

Scientific studies have demonstrated the following key functional benefits of MCTs and lauric acid:

• Energy metabolism: MCTs are rapidly absorbed by the liver and converted into ketones, making them a quick and efficient source of energy. This property supports weight management, athletic performance, and cognitive function (St-Onge & Jones, 2002).
• Antimicrobial action: Lauric acid and its metabolite, monolaurin, have shown effectiveness against a range of pathogens including Helicobacter pylori, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, and certain lipid-coated viruses like influenza and herpes (Shilling et al., 2013).
• Neurological support: Emerging studies indicate that coconut-derived MCTs may be beneficial in neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease due to ketone production that supports neuronal energy metabolism (Fernando et al., 2015).

Known as the “Tree of Heaven,” Cocos nucifera or Coconut Tree is a cornerstone of coastal and tropical agroecosystems, revered for providing “everything needed for life.” The cold-pressed Virgin Coconut Oil (VCO) derived from fresh coconut kernel is emerging as a scientifically validated functional fat.

Key Health Benefits of Virgin Coconut Oil

Feature	Scientific Basis	Functional Benefit
Medium-Chain Triglycerides(MCTs)	Lauric acid (~50%) converts to ketones, fuels brain, boosts metabolism (St-Onge & Jones, 2002)	Energy, weight management, cognition
Antimicrobial Properties	Monolaurin fights pathogens including viruses, bacteria (Dayrit, 2015)	Immune system support, gut microbiome balance
Oxidative Stability	High smoke point (~175°C), low PUFA content (Seneviratne et al., 2009)	Safe for cooking without toxic byproducts
Ayurvedic & Folk Use	Used as Abhyanga oil, hair tonic, wound healer	Holistic health, skin & digestive wellness

Virgin coconut oil aligns with indigenous knowledge systems that value minimal processing,

Virgin Coconut Oil vs Refined Oils

Unlike refined vegetable oils such as soybean, sunflower, or canola, which are often extracted using high heat and chemical solvents, VCO is extracted without heat or chemical treatment, thereby preserving its antioxidant compounds, polyphenols, and bioactive fats.

Parameter	Virgin Coconut Oil	Refined Seed Oils
Extraction Method	Cold-pressed (no heat/solvent)	Solvent extraction (hexane, high heat)
Main Fatty Acids	MCTs (Lauric, Caprylic, Capric)	PUFA (Linoleic, Linolenic)
Smoke Point	~175°C	220°C (but unstable)
Shelf Stability	High (resists rancidity)	Low (oxidizes quickly)
Immune-Supporting Properties	Proven antimicrobial activity	No comparable benefit

Ecological and Agronomic Value

From an agroecological perspective, coconut palms are drought-resilient, require minimal synthetic inputs, and support a wide range of intercropping systems including banana, cacao, pepper, yam, and fodder grasses. With proper management, a mature coconut palm can produce 50–100 coconuts per year for up to 60 years, offering a consistent and diversified livelihood for smallholders (APCC, 2019). Globally, India is the third largest producer of coconuts, after Indonesia and the Philippines, with an estimated production of 21 billion nuts annually across 2.1 million hectares (NHB, 2022). The southern states like Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh account for more than 90 percent of national production.

Each part of the tree is utilized:

• Nut: oil, milk, cream, pal-sugar, copra
• Husk: coir, mats, brushes, ropes
• Leaves: thatching, mats, handicrafts
• Wood: furniture, construction
• Sap: jaggery, vinegar, toddy
• Roots and shells: medicine, charcoal

Cultural and Ritual Significance

In Indian tradition, the coconut is offered in rituals and ceremonies as a symbol of purity, prosperity, and life. Breaking a coconut before a new beginning represents the shattering of ego and offering of self to the divine. In Ayurvedic formulations, coconut oil is used as a carrier for herbal oils, in abhyanga (therapeutic massage), and as a cooling agent in pitta-balancing treatments.

The ancient Sanskrit verse from the Kalpa Sutras praises:

नारिकेलं महाफलं त्रैलोक्ये फलमुत्तमम्
“Narikelaṁ mahāphalaṁ trailokye phalamuttamam”
“Among all fruits in the three worlds, coconut is considered the supreme.”

Tamil Cultural Proverb: புயலில் மகனை விட தேங்காய் முக்கியம்
“Puyalil maganai vida thengaai mukkiyam”
“In a storm, the coconut is considered more valuable than the son.” Literally meaning is if coconut tree is projected in storm, it protects the son (child) and family. This stark rural wisdom underscores the coconut’s role as a pillar of food, income, and life security.

“ಇಂಗು ತೆಂಗು ಇವೆರಡಿದ್ದರೆ, ಮಂಗವೂ ಅಡುಗೆ ಮಾಡಬಲ್ಲದು.”

“Ingu Tengu Iveradiddare, mangavu aduge madaballadu”

“Even a monkey can cook well if it has coconut and asafoetida.”
This rustic wisdom underscores the indispensable role of coconut and hing in traditional Indian cooking, not only for taste but also for nutrition, digestibility and health benefits.

Role in Sustainable Food Systems

Coconut-based farming systems are an integral component of regenerative and climate-resilient agriculture, especially in the coastal belts prone to saline intrusion, erratic rainfall, and market vulnerabilities. Integrated coconut farming with multi-tier crops and desi cattle ensures:

• Soil organic carbon buildup
• Enhanced pollination and biodiversity
• Improved water-use efficiency
• Diversified and year-round farm income

Coconut oil production also offers scope for green enterprise development through cold-pressed mills, value-added processing (virgin oil, flour, sugar, milk), and eco-friendly crafts from shell and coir.

Kamadhenu: The Sacred Cow and Golden Ghee

In the Sanatan Dharmic tradition, Kamadhenu—the divine, wish-fulfilling cow embodies the essence of abundance, nourishment, fertility, and ecological harmony. Described in ancient texts such as the Mahabharata and Puranas, Kamadhenu is not only a celestial being but also a symbolic representation of the Earth’s generosity and the regenerative power of life. In Indian rural life, this sacred symbol is reflected in the Desi (indigenous) cow, whose products are integral to food, farming, and spirituality. Among the most revered of these is ghee, especially when derived from indigenous cows using the traditional bilona method—a hand-churned, low-heat process that preserves the nutritional integrity and medicinal properties of the ghee. Far beyond a cooking medium, Desi Cow Ghee is considered a “life elixir” (amṛta) in Ayurveda and a vital ingredient in Panchagavya, Yajnas, Samskaras, and modern natural and regenerative farming practices.

Bullock and Millets are center of the logo the University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad 

 

Key Health Benefits of Desi Cow Ghee

Feature	Scientific Basis	Functional Benefit
Short-Chain Fatty Acids(SCFAs)	Butyrate reduces gut inflammation, improves insulin response (Canani et al., 2011)	Colon health, anti-inflammatory, immunity
Carrier for Nutrients	Enhances absorption of fat-soluble vitamins A, D, E, K	Better bioavailability of nutrients & herbs
Smoke Point	High (~250°C), suitable for deep cooking (Willett et al., 2019)	Safe, stable, and suitable for Indian cuisine
Ayurvedic Relevance	Considered Satvik and Anupana for Rasayanas	Spiritual and medicinal synergy

Beyond consumption, cow ghee plays a critical role in soil enrichment (via Panchagavya), biopesticide formulation, and as a cultural cornerstone of farm-forest spiritual ecology.

Why Refined Seed Oils Fall Short

Feature	Refined Seed Oils	Ghee / Coconut Oil
Extraction Method	Chemical solvents, high-heat processing	Cold-pressed or traditionally churned
Omega-6 to Omega-3 Ratio	~20:1 (pro-inflammatory)	Balanced fatty acid profile
Oxidative Stability	Low (PUFA-rich, oxidizes quickly)	High (MCTs / SCFAs are stable)
Processing Additives	Deodorants, preservatives	None
Health Impact	Linked to metabolic disease (Simopoulos, 2002)	Supports gut, heart, cognitive health

Thus, integrating ghee and coconut oil into functional food systems reclaims both health sovereignty and ecological resilience.

Nutritional Composition and Functional Properties

Desi cow ghee is predominantly composed of short-chain and medium-chain fatty acids (SCFAs and MCFAs), including butyrate, caproic, caprylic, and capric acids, which are rare in most vegetable oils.

Nutrient Component	Quantity (per 100g)	Functional Role
Saturated fats	~62–65%	Stability at high heat, energy source
Monounsaturated fats	~25–28%	Heart and brain health
Butyric acid (Butyrate)	~3–4%	Gut health, anti-inflammatory, colonocyte fuel
Omega-3 (ALA)	~1%	Anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective
Vitamins A, D, E, K	10–20% RDA/serving	Fat-soluble, boosts immunity & bone health
CLA (conjugated linoleic acid)	~0.2–0.5%	Antioxidant, metabolic health

(Sources: ICMR-NIN 2017; Mishra et al., 2021)

Scientific and Health Benefits

Modern biomedical research has affirmed many of the traditional claims regarding desi cow ghee:

• Gut Health and Immunity: Butyrate supports the integrity of intestinal lining, feeds beneficial microbiota, and reduces systemic inflammation (Canani et al., 2011; Hamer et al., 2008).
• Cardiovascular Health: Contrary to past beliefs, ghee from grass-fed cows has been shown to improve HDL cholesterol levels and reduce markers of inflammation (Mishra et al., 2021).
• Cognitive and Nervous System Support: Ghee acts as a brain tonic (medhya) in Ayurveda, and modern studies point to its neuroprotective antioxidant content.
• Heat Stability and Culinary Use: With a smoke point of around 250°C, ghee is one of the most stable fats for Indian cooking methods such as roasting and deep frying (Willett et al., 2019).

Traditional and Ritual Significance

In Vedic rituals, ghee is indispensable:

• Used in Yajnas and Homas: As an offering (Ahuti), ghee is considered a purifier and medium of transformation through fire (Agni), symbolizing the release of sattvic energy into the cosmos.
• Panchagavya: A blend of five products from the indigenous cow—milk, curd, ghee, dung, and urine—used for seed treatment, soil fertility, and detoxification rituals in both Ayurveda and natural farming.
• Anupāna in Ayurveda: Ghee acts as a vehicle to carry medicinal herbs deep into the tissues (dhatus) and across the blood-brain barrier (Lad, 1984; Sharma, 2018).

Ancient Ayurvedic texts such as Charaka Samhita and Sushruta Samhita describe cow ghee as:

“सर्वेषां मेधसां श्रेष्ठं स्नेहनां च परं स्मृतम्।“
Sarveṣāṁ medhasāṁ śreṣṭhaṁ snehānāṁ ca paraṁ smṛtam
“Ghee is considered the best among all fats and supreme among brain tonics.”

Desi Cow vs Exotic Breeds: Nutritional and Ecological Advantage

Desi cow breeds such as Gir, Killara, Sahiwal, Tharparkar, Hallikar, and Malnad Gidda, etc have a unique  beta-casein profile, and produce milk and ghee richer in CLA, SCFAs, and micronutrients compared to high-yielding exotic breeds.

Trait	Desi Cow Ghee (A2)	Commercial Ghee (A1)
Butyrate content	High	Moderate to low
A2 beta-casein	Present	Absent or mixed (A1 dominant)
Digestibility	High	Can cause intolerance (in A1)
Ecological adaptability	High (low maintenance)	High-input systems needed
Role in mixed farming	Excellent	Limited

(Sources: Singh et al., 2020; National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, ICAR)

Role in Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Livelihoods

In natural and organic farming systems (e.g., Subhash Palekar’s ZBNF or Andhra Pradesh’s Community-Managed Natural Farming), desi cow ghee is a core input:

• Jeevamrutha: A fermented microbial inoculant made using ghee, dung, and jaggery that boosts soil microbial activity.
• Beejamrutha: Seed treatment with ghee-based formulations improves germination and disease resistance.
• Dung and urine: Provide nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and vital microbes—reducing dependency on chemical fertilizers.

Moreover, desi cow-based dairy enterprises contribute to women’s livelihoods, decentralized food processing, and climate-resilient circular economies with minimal ecological footprint.

Cultural Insight and Indigenous Wisdom

A traditional Sanskrit invocation states:

“कामधेनुं नमस्यामि सर्वकामार्थसिद्धये”
“I bow to Kamadhenu, who fulfills all righteous desires.”

In Indian folklore, the saying goes:“A house with a cow will never face hunger.”
This is not just sentiment—it reflects a functional ecosystem where food, fuel, manure, and medicine come from a single living being. Kamadhenu and the golden ghee she offers are not merely spiritual metaphors but real, regenerative assets that nourish soil, body, and society. In a world seeking climate-smart nutrition and ecological sustainability, Desi Cow Ghee stands as a biocultural bridge between ancient healing traditions and modern health science. Its reintegration into food systems, farming practices, and public health can play a key role in building a resilient, self-reliant, and sattvik Bharat.

Crops, trees and animals are the intergral part of the sustainable farming

 Kalpavriksha & Kamadhenu in Sustainable Farming & Agroecology

These sacred species are not standalone nutrition sources. They are foundational pillars of natural farming, agroecology, and functional food forests.

Agroecological Function	Coconut (Kalpavriksha)	Cow (Kamadhenu)
Soil Health	Litter biomass, water retention	Manure, urine, microbial inoculants
Biodiversity	Pollinator support, nesting sites	Livestock integration, pest control
Carbon Sequestration	Evergreen canopy, root mass	Grassland-cow synergy promotes SOC buildup
Rural Livelihoods	Oil, coir, toddy, fruit	Milk, ghee, compost, draft power
Cultural-Spiritual Significance	Used in rituals, weddings, festivals	Yajnas, Panchagavya, Gomaya, Gau Pooja

Together, they represent living regenerative capital—yielding food, health, income, and culture in perpetuity.

Kamadhenu at the Gate of Abundance,  and Kalpavriksha at the Door of Health

“A home with a cow and a coconut tree shall never go hungry.”

This age-old proverb is more than a rural belief—it is a time-tested blueprint for decentralized food security, functional nutrition, and natural capital regeneration.

They are not just sacred—they are strategic.

• They fit perfectly into Natural Farming, Nandi Krishi, Food Forests, Agroecology, Agroforestry, and Cow Sanctuary (Biradar, 2022)
• They empower smallholder women, self-help groups, and youth-based green enterprises.
• They deliver high Return on Regeneration (RoR) with minimal resource footprint.

Green Growth Perspective

Parameter	Virgin Coconut Oil	Desi Cow Ghee
Yield/Tree or Cow	100–150 nuts/year	200–500 L milk/year
Processing Simplicity	Low-tech, decentralized units	Bilona method, local ghee units
Market Value (per Litre)	₹300–500	₹800–1,200
Ecological Footprint	Minimal (no irrigation, no chemicals)	Zero-waste (dung, urine, ghee, curd)
Carbon Balance	Negative (net sink)	Positive with dung-based biogas
Payback Period	3–5 years (tree), 2–3 years (cow)	Recurring income after that

Kalpavriksha and Kamadhenu are not merely metaphors of abundance—they are living systems capable of addressing today’s crises of health, hunger, climate, and soil degradation.

Reintegrating Virgin Coconut Oil and Desi Cow Ghee into our farms, homes, and diets is an act of ecological restoration, nutritional reawakening, and cultural renewal. Let us reclaim these sacred systems—grounded in dharma and validated by data—for a swastha, samruddha, and satvik Bharat.

References

• Asia Pacific Coconut Community (APCC). (2019). Coconut Statistical Yearbook. Jakarta, Indonesia: APCC Secretariat.
• Canani, R. B., Di Costanzo, M., & Leone, L. (2011). Potential beneficial effects of butyrate in intestinal and extraintestinal diseases. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 17(12), 1519–1528. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i12.1519
• Dayrit, F. M. (2015). The properties of lauric acid and their significance in coconut oil. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 92(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-014-2562-7
• Enig, M. G. (2000). Know Your Fats: The Complete Primer for Understanding the Nutrition of Fats, Oils, and Cholesterol. Bethesda Press.
• FAO & UNEP. (2021). A Multi-Billion-Dollar Opportunity: Repurposing Agricultural Support to Transform Food Systems. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/publications
• FAO. (2021). The State of Food and Agriculture: Making Agrifood Systems More Resilient to Shocks and Stresses. Rome: FAO. https://www.fao.org/3/cb4476en/online/cb4476en.html
• Fernando, W. M. A. D. B., Martins, I. J., Goozee, K. G., Brennan, C. S., & Martins, R. N. (2015). The role of medium-chain triglycerides in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: A review of human and animal studies. Aging Research Reviews, 20, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2014.12.003
• Hamer, H. M., Jonkers, D., Venema, K., Vanhoutvin, S., Troost, F. J., & Brummer, R. J. M. (2008). Review article: The role of butyrate on colonic function. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 27(2), 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03562.x
• ICAR. (2022). Natural Farming Comparative Research Trials: Annual Summary Report. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.
• ICMR-NIN. (2017). Indian Food Composition Tables 2017. Hyderabad: National Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research.
• Lad, V. (1984). Ayurveda: The Science of Self-Healing. New Delhi: Lotus Press.
• Mishra, A., Kumar, A., & Shukla, A. (2021). Desi cow ghee: A functional food for health and wellness. Journal of Ethnic Foods, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42779-021-00082-0
• National Horticulture Board (NHB). (2022). Horticultural Statistics at a Glance 2022. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India. http://nhb.gov.in
• Sharma, R. K., & Dash, B. (2018). Charaka Samhita: Text with English Translation and Critical Exposition Based on Cakrapani Datta’s Ayurveda Dipika (Vol. 1–3). Varanasi: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office.
• Shilling, M., Matt, L., Rubin, E., Visitacion, M. P., Haller, N. A., Grey, S. F., & Woolverton, C. J. (2013).Antimicrobial effects of virgin coconut oil and its medium-chain fatty acids on Clostridium difficile. Journal of Medicinal Food, 16(12), 1079–1085. https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2012.0303
• Singh, R. R., Thakur, N., & Dubey, S. K. (2020). Characterization of A2 milk and comparative health effects. Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 73(6), 579–584. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-0563.2020.00106.2
• St-Onge, M. P., & Jones, P. J. H. (2002). Physiological effects of medium-chain triglycerides: Potential agents in the prevention of obesity. Journal of Nutrition, 132(3), 329–332. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/132.3.329
• Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S., … & Murray, C. J. L. (2019).Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet, 393(10170), 447–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4
• NBAGR–ICAR. (2022). Indigenous Livestock Breeds of India: Conservation and Utility. Karnal: National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, Indian Council of Agricultural Research.